Publications by Professor Helen Scott
Full list of publications by Professor Helen Scott.
- Helen Scott, Anton Fagan, Private Law in a Changing World: Essays for Danie Visser (also published as Acta Juridica [2019]), Juta & Co, 2019
- Helen Scott, Eric Descheemaeker, Iniuria and the Common Law, Hart Publishing, 2013
- Helen Scott, Unjust Enrichment in South African Law: Rethinking Enrichment by Transfer, Hart Publishing, 2013
- Helen Scott, ‘Masters, Slaves and Insults: Rereading D. 47, 10, 15, 45‒48’, in Die unverzichtbare Wissenschaft – The Indispensable Science (eds B Gsell, T Rüfner and U Babusiaux), Mohr Siebeck, 2026
- Helen Scott, ‘Comparative models and their limitations: Edwin Cameron's impact on the law of trusts and unjustified enrichment’, in Edwin Cameron: Influences and Impact (eds Nurina Ally and Leo Boonzaier), Pretoria University Law Press, 2025
- Helen Scott, ‘Chasing, Lying and Persuading: D 47.2.52.19 – 24 in Context’, in Essays in Law and History for David Ibbetson (eds Joe Sampson and Stelios Tofaris), Hart Publishing, 2024
- Helen Scott, ‘Property | Unjust Enrichment’, in Borderlines in Private Law (eds William Day and Julius Grower), Oxford University Press, 2024
- Helen Scott, ‘Mistake of Law, Again’, in Shaping the Law of Obligations: Essays in Honour of Professor Ewan McKendrick (eds Edwin Peel and Rebecca Probert), Oxford University Press, 2023
- Helen Scott, ‘What Mistake Can Do’, in Iurium Itinera: Historische Rechtsvergleichung und vergleichende Rechtsgeschichte (eds Nils Jansen and Sonja Meier), Mohr Siebeck, 2022
- Helen Scott, ‘Comparative taxonomy: an introduction’, in Research Handbook on Unjust Enrichment and Restitution (eds Elise Bant, Kit Barker and Simone Degeling), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020
- Helen Scott, Robin Evans Jones, ‘Lord Atkin, Donoghue v Stevenson and the Lex Aquilia: Civilian Roots of the “Neighbour” Principle’, in Wrongful Damage to Property in Roman Law (eds Paul J du Plessis), Edinburgh University Press, 2018
- Helen Scott, Anton Fagan, ‘Regulating Risk Through Private Law: South Africa’, in Regulating Risk Through Private Law (eds Matthew Dyson), Intersentia, 2018
- Helen Scott, ‘Reflections on the Restitution Revolution: South Africa’, in Revolution and Evolution in Private Law (eds Sarah Worthington, Andrew Robertson and Graham Virgo), Hart Publishing, 2018
- Helen Scott, ‘The Death of Doctrine?—Private Law Scholarship in South African Today’, in Legislators, Judges, and Professors (eds Jürgen Basedow, Holger Fleischer and Reinhard Zimmermann), Mohr Siebeck, 2016
- Helen Scott, ‘Defence, Denial or Cause of Action? “Enrichment Owed” and the Absence of a Legal Ground’, in Defences in Unjust Enrichment (eds Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith), Bloomsbury, 2016
- Helen Scott, ‘Liber homo suo nomine utilem Aquiliae habet actionem: D. 9,2,13 pr in context’, in Inter cives necnon peregrinos: Essays in honour of Boudewijn Sirks (eds Jan Hallebeek, Martin Schermaier, Roberto Fiori, Ernest Metzger and Jean-Pierre Coriat), Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2014
- Helen Scott, ‘Contumelia and the South African Law of Defamation’’, in Iniuria and the Common Law (eds Eric Descheemaeker and Helen Scott), Hart Publishing, 2013
- Helen Scott, Eric Descheemaeker, ‘Iniuria and the Common Law’’, in Iniuria and the Common Law (eds Eric Descheemaeker and Helen Scott), Hart Publishing, 2013
- Helen Scott, ‘Pits and Pruners: Culpa and Social Practice in Digest 9.2’, in Judge and Jurist: Essays in Memory of Lord Rodger of Earslferry (eds Andrew Burrows, David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann), Oxford University Press, 2013
- Helen Scott, Daniel Visser, ‘The impact of legal culture on the law of unjustified enrichment: the role of reasons’, in Exploring Private Law (eds Elise Bant and Matthew Harding), 2010
- Helen Scott, Daniel Visser, ‘Constitutionalising the Law of Unjustified Enrichment’, (2025) 15 Constitutional Court Review 403‒27, 2026
- Helen Scott, Danie Visser, ‘Unjust enrichment in South Africa’, [2025] Lloyd Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 668‒81
- Helen Scott, Danie Visser, ‘Unjust enrichment in South Africa’, [2024] Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 663–72
- Helen Scott, Danie Visser, ‘Unjust enrichment in South Africa’, [2023] Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 656–69
- Helen Scott, ‘Undue Transfer under Error (the Condictio Indebiti)’, (2022) 26 Edinburgh Law Review 403–408
- Helen Scott, ‘Interference without ownership: the theft of incorporeal money in the South African law of unjustified enrichment’, [2021] Acta Juridica 343–73
- Helen Scott, ‘Change and continuity in the law of unjust enrichment’, [2019] Acta Juridica 469–92
- Helen Scott, ‘The History of Foreseeability’, (2019) 72 Current Legal Problems 287–314
- Helen Scott, ‘Transforming the South African Law of Unjustified Enrichment’, (2017) 25 Restitution Law Review 29–43
- Helen Scott, ‘Rationalising the South African Law of Enrichment’, (2014) 18 Edinburgh Law Review 433–51
- Helen Scott, ‘Killing and Causing Death in Roman Law’, (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 101–22
- Helen Scott, Daniel Visser, ‘Excess baggage? Rethinking Risk Allocation in the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment’, (2012) 92 Boston University Law Review 859–83
- Helen Scott, ‘Absolute ownership and legal pluralism in Roman law: Two arguments’, Acta Juridica [2011] 23–34
- Helen Scott, ‘Liability for the mass publication of private information in South African law: NM v Smith (Freedom of Expression Institute as Amicus Curiae)’, (2007) 18 Stellenbosch Law Review 387–404
- Helen Scott, ‘The requirement of excusable mistake in the context of the condictio indebiti: Scottish and South African law compared’, (2007) 124 South African Law Journal 827–66
- Helen Scott, ‘Omnes unius aestimemus assis: A Note on Liability for Defamation in Catullus V’, (2006) 3 Roman Legal Tradition 95–110
- Helen Scott, ‘Restitution of extra-contractual transfers: limits of the absence of legal ground analysis’, (2006) 14 Restitution Law Review 93–105
- Helen Scott, Nicholas Barber, ‘State Liability under Francovich for Decisions of National Courts’, (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 403–406