Publications by Dr Jonathan Rogers

Full list of publications by Dr Jonathan Rogers.

  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘The Time Limit on Prosecutions for Underage Sexual Intercourse in the Sexual Offences Act 1956: A Continuing Problem’, in Criminal Law Reform Now (eds RA Duff, JJ Child), Hart Publishing
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘The Role of the Public Prosecutor in Applying and Developing the Substantive Criminal Law’, in The Constitution of the Criminal Law (eds RA Duff, L Farmer, S Marshall, M Renzo, V Tadros), Oxford University Press
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Culpability in Self-Defence and Crime Prevention’, in Seeking Security (eds IH Dennis, GR Sullivan), Hart Publishing
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘The Boundaries of Abuse of Process in Criminal Trials’, in Current Legal Problems, Oxford University Press
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Prosecutors, Courts and Conduct of the Accused which Engages a Qualified Convention Right’, in Current Legal Problems, Oxford University Press
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Reclaiming the Essence of ‘second limb’ Abuse of Process’, [2022] Crim.L.R. 659-678
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘A Human Rights Perspective on the Evidential Test for bringing Prosecutions’, [2017] Crim.L.R. 680-697
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Prosecutorial Policies, Prosecutorial Systems, and the Purdy Litigation’, [2010] Crim. L.R. 543-564
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘The Codification of Attempts and the Case for ‘Preparation’’, [2008] Crim. L.R. 937-954
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Restructuring the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion in England’, 26(4) (2006) OJLS 775-803.
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Applying the Doctrine of Positive Obligations in the European Convention of Human Rights to Domestic Substantive Criminal Law in Domestic Proceedings’, [2003] Crim. L.R. 690-712
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘A Criminal Lawyer’s Response to Chastisement in the European Court of Human Rights’, [2002] Crim.L.R. 98-113
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Necessity, Private Defence and the Killing of Mary’, [2001] Crim.L.R. 515-526
  • Jonathan Rogers, ‘Justifying the Use of Firearms by Policemen and Soldiers: a Response to the Home Office’s Review of the Law on the Use of Lethal Force’, 18 Legal Studies (1998) 486-509