Publications by Dr Roderick Munday

Full list of publications by Dr Roderick Munday.

  • Roderick Munday, Evidence (Core text), Oxford University Press, 2017
  • Roderick Munday, MA Clarke, RJA Hooley, LS Sealy, AM Tettenborn, PG Turner, Commercial Law: Text, Materials and Cases, Oxford University Press, 2017
  • Roderick Munday, Agency: Law and Principles, Oxford University Press, 2016
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence (Core Text) (Oxford University Press), 2011
  • Roderick Munday, Agency: Law and Principles, Oxford University Press, 2010
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence (Core Text), Oxford University Press, 2009
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence (Core Text), Oxford University Press, 2007
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence (Core Text), Oxford University Press, 2005
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence, Butterworths Student Statutes, Lexis-Nexis/Butterworths, 2003
  • Roderick Munday, Pierre Legrand (Ed), Pierre Legrand (Ed), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, 2003
  • Roderick Munday, Evidence, Lexis-Nexis/Butterworths, 2003
  • Roderick Munday, Basil S. Markesinis, Basil S. Markesinis, An Outline of the Law of Agency, Lexis-Nexis/Butterworths, 1998
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Judicial Opinion and Dissenting Opinion: A Paean to Dissent’, in Odùvodnìní soudního rozhodnutí / The Judicial Opinion / Begründung von Gerichtsentscheidung, Centra Právni Komparatistiky Právnické Fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, 2011
  • Roderick Munday, Stefan Vogenauer, Hans Adenas, Stefan Vogenauer, Hans Adenas, ‘Configuring Reason’, in A Matter of Style? The Form of Judgments in the United Kingdom and Abroad: Papers Delivered at a Seminar in Honour of Rt Hon Lord Bingham of Cornhill in Oxford, June 20 and 21, 2008 (Forthcoming), Hart Publishing, 2009
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Appealing Contempt of Court: Parliament's Homeric Nod’, [2012] Stat. L.R. 354
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Case Management, Disclosure and the Rules of Evidence’, (2012) 176 C.L. & J. 377-80
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Refreshing Memory: Previous Statements that Fail to Revive Witnesses’ Memories’, (2012) 176 C.L. & J. 213-6
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Interpretation of Legislation in England: The Expanding Quest for Parliamentary Intention’, (2011) 75 RabelsZ 764-86
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Athwal and All That: Previous Statements, Narrative, and the Taxonomy of Hearsay’, [2010] J. Crim. Law 415-433
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Single-Act Propensity’, [2010] J. Crim. Law 128-145
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Province of the Prerogative of Mercy Determined’, (2009) 173 JPN 181
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Suppressing Dissent’, (2008) 172 JPN 830
  • Roderick Munday, ‘La contumace (défaut criminel): la necessité de la présence du prévenu en droit anglais’, (2008) Essais de philosophie pénale et de criminologie, vol. 7, pp. 279-296
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Bridge that Choked a Watercourse or Repetitive Dictionary Disorder’, [2008] 29 Statute Law Review 26-44
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Misconduct that "has to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged" ... More or Less’, [2008] J. Crim. Law 214-35
  • Roderick Munday, ‘In the Wake of 'Good Governance': Impact Assessments and the Politicisation of Statutory Interpretation’, (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 386-413
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Preservation of the Common Law and the Perpetuation of Error: Section 118(1), r. 4(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003’, (2008) 172 J.P. 348-354
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Legislation that would 'Preserve' the Common Law: The Case of the Declaration of Intention’, (2008) 124 Law Quarterly Review 46-71
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Of Law Clerks and Judicial Assistants’, (2007) 171 Justice of the Peace 455-60
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Quick and the Dead: Who Counts as a 'Person' under s. 100 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003?’, [2007] 71 Journal of Criminal Law 238-58
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Judicial Discretion to Admit Hearsay Evidence’, (2007) 171 Justice of the Peace 276-284
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Judicial Footnotes: A Footnote (with Footnotes)’, (2006) 170 Justice of the Peace 864-870
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Fish with Feathers: English Judgments with Footnotes’, (2006) 170 Justice of the Peace 444-8
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Coming of Age in the Privy Council’, (2006) 170 Justice of the Peace 244-248
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Case Management, Similar Fact Evidence in Civil Cases, and a Divided Law of Evidence’, (2006) 10 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 81-103
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Purposes of Gateway (g): Yet Another Problematic of the Criminal Justice Act 2003’, [2006] Criminal Law Review 300-318
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Exemplum Habemus: Reflections on the Judicial Studies Board's Specimen Directions’, [2006] 70 Journal of Criminal Law 27-74
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Explanatory Notes and Statutory Interpretation’, (2006) 170 Justice of the Peace 124-132
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Cut-Throat Defences and the 'Propensity to be Untruthful' under Section 104 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003’, [2005] Criminal Law Review 624-37
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Court, the Dictionary, and the True Meaning of 'Oppression': A Neo-Socratic Dialogue on English Legal Method’, [2005] 26 Statute Law Review 103-24
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Bad Character Rules and Riddles: 'Explanatory Notes' and True Meanings of Section 103(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003’, [2005] Criminal Law Review 337-54
  • Roderick Munday, ‘"Round up the Usual Suspects!" or What We Have to Fear from Part 11 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (2005) 169 Justice of the Peace 328-35’, 2005
  • Roderick Munday, ‘What Constitutes 'Other Reprehensible Behaviour' under the Bad Character Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003?’, [2005] Criminal Law Review 24-43
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Reasoning without Dissent; Dissenting without Reason’, (2004) 168 Justice of the Peace 968-75 and 991-1,000
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Lawyers and Latin’, (2004) 168 Justice of the Peace 775-9
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Law Reports, Transcripts, and the Fabric of the Criminal Law - A Speculation’, [2004] 68 J. Crim. Law 227-243
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Failures to Mention Facts, the 'Pre-prepared Statement', and the Reality of Legal Representation’, (2004) The Criminal Lawyer, No. 138, p. 3
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Adverse Denial and Purposive Confession’, [2003] Criminal Law Review 850
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Judicial Configurations: Permutations of the Court and Properties of Judgment’, [2002] Cambridge Law Journal 612
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Transcripts: Bane or Boon?’, (2002) 2 Legal Information Management No 2, p. 32
  • Roderick Munday, ‘'All for One and One for All': The Rise to Prominence of the Composite Judgment in the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal’, [2002] Cambridge Law Journal 321
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Law Reporting: Maintaining a Literate Common Law’, (2002) 166 Justice of the Peace 284
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Inferences and Explanations’, (2002) Archbold News No. 2, p. 6
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Judicial Studies Board Specimen Directions and the Enforcement of Orthodoxy: A Modest Case Study’, [2002] Journal of Criminal Law 158
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Over-Citation: Stemming the Tide’, (2002) 166 Justice of the Peace (Part 1) 6, (part 2) 29 and (Part 3) 83
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Sham Marriages and Spousal Compellability’, [2001] Journal of Criminal Law 336
  • Roderick Munday, ‘'Official' Law Reports, Neutral Citation and Other Curiosities: Another Visit to the Grand Canon’, (2001) 165 Justice of the Peace 342
  • Roderick Munday, ‘New Sections for Old!’, (2001) 151 New Law Journal 699
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The 'Official' Law Reports’, (2001) 165 Justice of the Peace 162
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Does Latin Impede Legal Understanding?’, (2000) 164 Justice of the Peace 995
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Le principe de la legalite dans les pays de common law’, (1999) Revue penitentiaire et de droit penal 335
  • Roderick Munday, ‘What Constitutes a Good Character?’, [1997] Criminal Law Review 247
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Inferences from Silence and European Human Rights Law’, [1996] Criminal Law Review 370
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Bench Books: Can the Judiciary Keep a Secret?’, [1996] Criminal Law Review 296
  • Roderick Munday, ‘What do the French think of their Jury? Views from Poitiers and Paris’, (1995) 15 Legal Studies 66
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Paradox of Cross-Examination to Credit: Too Close for Comfort’, [1994] Cambridge Law Journal 303
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Comparative Law and English Law's Character Evidence Rules’, (1993) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 589
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Jury Trial, Continental-Style’, (1993) 13 Legal Studies 204
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Musings on the Dying Declaration’, (1993) 22 Anglo-American Law review 42
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Trials of Defendants in Handcuffs’, (1993) 157 Justice of the Peace 35
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Bentham, Bacon, and the Movement for the Reform of English Law Reporting’, (1992) 4 Utilitas 299
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Directing Juries on the Defendant's Good Character’, [1991] Journal of Criminal Law 521
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Name Suppression: An Adjunct to the Presumption of Innocence and to Mitigation of Sentence’, [1991] Criminal Law Review 680 and 753
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Hostile Witnesses and the Admission of Statements under Section 23 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988’, [1991] Criminal Law Review 349
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Salvaging the Law of Agency’, [1991] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 1
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Proof of Guilt by Association under Section 74 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984’, [1990] Criminal Law Review 236
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Irregular Disclosure of Evidence of Bad Character’, [1990] Criminal Law Review 92
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Calling a Hostile Witness’, [1989] Criminal Law Review 866
  • Roderick Munday, ‘A Reform that Almost Wasn't’, [1989] New Zealand Law Journal 345
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Admissibility of Evidence of Propensity in Common Law Jurisdictions’, (1989) 19 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 223
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Capacity to Execute an Enduring Power of Attorney in New Zealand and England’, [1989] 13 New Zealand Universities Law Review 253
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Handcuffing the Defendant’, (1989) 139 New Law Journal 47
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Handling the Evidential Exception’, [1987] Crimial Law Review 345
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Judge who answered his Critics’, [1987] Cambridge Law Journal 303
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Wilder Permutations of Section 1(f) of the Criminal Evidence Act 1898’, [1987] 7 Legal Studies 137
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Stepping beyond the Bounds of Credibility: the Application of Section 1(f)(ii) of the Criminal Evidence Act 1898’, [1986] Criminal Law Review 511
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The French Law of Surnames: A Study in Rights of Property, Personality and Privacy’, (1986) 6 Legal Studies 79
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Girl they named Manhattan: the Law of Forenames in France and England’, (1985) 5 Legal Studies 331
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Corroboration and the Partial Admission’, [1985] Criminal Law Review 190
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Legislating in Defence of the French Language’, [1985] Cambridge Law Journal 218
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Reflections on the Criminal Evidence Act 1898’, [1985] Cambridge Law Journal 62
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Duties of Defence Counsel [1983] Criminal Law Review 703’, 1983
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Common Lawyer's Philosophy of Legislation’, (1983) 14 Rechtstheorie 191
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Excluding the Expert Witness’, [1981] Criminal Law Review 688
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Order in the Indictment’, [1981] 1 Legal Studies 148
  • Roderick Munday, ‘Tribunal Lore: Legalism and the Industrial Tribunals’, (1981) Industrial Law Journal 146
  • Roderick Munday, ‘The Uniform Interpretation of International Conventions’, (1978) 27 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 450
  • Roderick Munday, ‘New Dimensions of Precedent’, (1978) XIV Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law (New Series) 201
  • Roderick Munday, ‘A Legal History of the Factor’, (1977) 6 Anglo-American Law Review 221